Hi Friends,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013
Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically
Translate
Sunday, 24 January 2016
Saturday, 16 January 2016
CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
— THE NEW DEAL —
Date: 4th Nov., 1985
Place: Bombay
Authors:
H. C. Parekh
I. R. Sethi
V. K. Mahajan
(Larsen & Toubro Limited)
LETTER
LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED
Saki Vihar Road, Powai
Bombay 400 072
November 4, 1985
Professor Ashok Chandra
Educational Advisor (T)
Ministry of Education
Government of India
New Delhi – 110 001
Dear Sir,
CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION – A
POLICY PERSPECTIVE
Kindly refer to your letter dated
September 4, 1985, along with a copy of the report "Challenge of
Education – A Policy Perspective".
I have pleasure in sending
herewith some preliminary thoughts on Education Policy. These have been
compiled by me along with two of my colleagues, Mr. I. R. Sethi and Mr. V. K.
Mahajan.
The thoughts expressed herein are
personal views of the authors and not of our organisation.
In case you find that some of the
thoughts expressed in this folder are worth pursuing by developing a sharp,
time-bound ACTION-PLAN, and if you would like me to associate with such an
exercise, please feel free to write to me.
I think I should also mention my
association with educational institutions. At present I am a member of the
Governing Councils/Board of Governors of:
- Victoria Jubilee Technical Institute — Bombay
- Fr. Agnel Polytechnic — Bombay
- L&T Institute of Technology (LTIT) — Bombay
- Regional Engineering College — Surat
I am happy to enclose herewith a
booklet on LTIT – which, I hope, you will find useful.
With kind regards,
Yours faithfully,
(Signature)
(H. C. Parekh)
General Manager
Larsen & Toubro Limited
Encl.: *
CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION - INDEX
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
SR. No. |
DESCRIPTION |
PAGE NO. |
|
1. |
1 |
|
|
2. |
2 |
|
|
3. |
3 |
|
|
4. |
4 |
|
|
5. |
5 |
|
|
EXPENDITURE ON EDUCATION |
||
|
6. |
6 |
|
|
7. |
7 |
|
|
8. |
8 |
|
|
9. |
9 |
|
|
10. |
10 |
|
|
11. |
11 |
|
|
12. |
12 |
|
|
13. |
13 |
|
|
TEACHERS |
||
|
14. |
14 |
|
|
15. |
Trained Teachers |
15 |
|
16. |
Teacher’s Salaries to total
Expenses |
16 |
|
17. |
Teacher’s Motivation |
17 |
|
18. |
Quality of Teachers |
18
|
|
TECHNICAL EDUCATION |
||
|
19. |
Standard of Technical
Educations |
19 |
|
20. |
Technical ( Engineering)
Institutions |
20 |
|
21. |
Vocational Education
(Industrial) |
21 |
|
22. |
Adult Literacy |
22 |
|
FACILITIES |
||
|
23. |
Basic Facilities in Educational |
23 |
|
24. |
Better Utilizations of existing
Resources |
24 |
|
THE NEW DEAL |
||
|
25. |
Why have things gone wrong |
25 |
|
26. |
Satellite Literacy Programme |
26 |
|
27. |
Agricultural Vocational
Institutes |
27 |
|
283 |
Examination System |
28 |
|
29. |
Dignity of Labour |
29 |
|
30. |
Industry Institute Integration |
30 |
|
31. |
Income Tax exemption on
reimbursement of Educational Expenses |
31 |
|
32. |
Audit Committees for Education |
32 |
|
33. |
Requisites Norms for Education |
33 |
|
34. |
Educational System – A frame
Work |
34 |
|
35. |
Education |
35 |
|
36. |
Education at a glance- Bar
Chart |
36 |
|
ENROLMENT |
||
|
37. |
Percentage of Children enrolled
in Schools- Bar Chart |
37 |
|
38. |
School enrolment by level &
sex 1981-82- Bar Chart |
38 |
|
39. |
Progress of Literacy :
1901-1981 |
39 |
|
40. |
Enrolment Rates – Growth
1950-51, 1980-81 |
40 |
|
41. |
Enrolment Gap |
41 |
|
EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS |
||
|
42. |
Number of Educational
Institutions |
42 |
|
43. |
Educational Institutions –
Pie-Chart |
43 |
|
44. |
Growth of Educational
Institutions 1950-1985- Bar Chart |
44 |
|
EXPENDITURE ON EDUCATION |
||
|
45. |
Expenditure on Education |
45 |
|
46. |
Budgetary requirements |
46 |
|
47. |
Share of Plan outlay for
Education Private Donations |
47 |
|
48. |
Private Donations for Education
– Trend Chart |
48 |
|
49. |
Share of Plan outlay for
Elementary Education |
49 |
|
50. |
Per Capita Expenditure on
Education- State wise |
50 |
|
51. |
Per capita Expenditure on
Education – Bar Chart |
51 |
|
52. |
Expenditure on Education –
rural V/s Urban |
52 |
|
53. |
Expenditure on Education –
Rural V/s Urban – Pie-chart |
53 |
|
54. |
Expenditure per pupil per annum |
54 |
|
55. |
Teachers Profile |
55. |
|
56. |
Technical (Engineering)
Institutions |
56. |
|
57. |
Facilities in Institutions |
57 |
|
58. |
Why use Black-Money in
Education |
58 |
|
59. |
Questionnaires |
59. |
ENROLMENT (PRIMARY ) ONLY 76%
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
Nov. 1985 |
ENROLMENT (PRIMARY ) ONLY 76% |
|
PRESENT SITUATION : - In
India enrolment at primary level is only 76% - China 117% - France 112% - Singapore 107% - USSR 106% - Japan 101% - USA 98% In 1981 out of total 15 Crores
(of age group 6-14 years) Only 9.3 crores were enrolled. |
|
|
CHANGE / ACTION DESIRED : China with much higher
Population has achieved highest enrolment rate which is an exemplary
indication of its development. If India has to achieve some
world standing the primary enrolment will have to be boosted to 100% |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED: Elementary education would
eradicate illiteracy along with many other ourses associated with it chiefly
population explosion |
|
|
ACTION BY: Ministry of Education. Ministry
of Family Welfare. Gram Panchayats. Social
organizations. |
|
MIDDLE EDUCATION
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
Nov. 1985 |
MIDDLE EDUCATION |
|
PRESENT SITUATION: (LAKHS) 1950 1985 GROWTH-
RATE Primary Schools
(Nos.) 2.01 5.04 2.6% Middle Schools
(Nos.) 0.13 1.23 7.2% RATIO –
MIDDLE:PRIMARY 1:15 1:4 |
|
|
CHANGE / ACTION DESIRED : - As
Laid Down In the Constitution – Education up to the age of 14 years (i.e.
till middle level ) is responsibility of Government i.e. it should be
compulsory & free - Even
though the ratio of middle schools has improved still in order to reach the
above goal there has to be 4 fold increases in middle schools as compared
with Primary. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED : Constitutional obligation
towards citizens will be met |
|
|
ACTION BY : Ministry of Education, GOI |
|
ENROLMENT IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
NOV. 1985 |
ENROLMENT IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS |
|
PRESENT SITUATION : ENROLMENT IN 1950-51
Was 12.2 Lacs Enrolment in 1980-81
was 94.9 Lacs Growth-rate
(Compound) 7.08% per annum Whereas growth-rate in Primary
was - In
Fifties ... 6.2% - In
Sixties ... 5.0% - In
Seventies .. 5% |
|
|
CHANGE/ ACTION DESIRED : Even though the growth-rate in
Secondary Education was higher it may not sustain due to drop in growth-rate
of Primary. When we achieve 100% enrolment
rate at Primary level. Larger growth-rate will be required at Secondary level
as well. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED : Level of literacy will go up. |
|
|
ACTION BY : State Governments. |
|
ENROLMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
NOV.1985 |
ENROLMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION |
|
PRESENT SITUATION : Total Enrolment in higher
education in 1981 was only 31 lacs which was only 2.94% of the total numbers
enrolled. |
|
|
CHANGE/ ACTION DESIRED : World Is Progressing into
high-tech. areas. To prepare manpower for the needs of 21st century.
More and more students will have to be motivated to opt for higher studies.
Ideally 10% of the enrolled must find their way into higher education. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED : India will be equipped to meet
challenges of boom in Electrics / Computer/ Energy Development Era. |
|
|
ACTION BY : Govt. must encourage Private
Sector including Industrial Houses to invest in setting of Institute of
Educational/ Research Excellence. |
|
ENROLMENT OF GIRLS (COMPARED
WITH BOYS)
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
NOV. 1985 |
ENROLMENT OF GIRLS (COMPARED
WITH BOYS) |
|
PRESENT SITUTION: BOYS GIRLS
Primary
Stage 84% 54%
Secondary
Stage 33% 16%
Higher Education
Stage 6%
3% |
|
|
CHANGE/ ACTION DESIRED : Even at Primary stage only 54%
girls get enrolled and this rate drops to as 16% in Secondary. 46% Population
is that of female. Unless and until this Population the country cannot
prosper. Primary Education for girls
should be Compulsory. Secondary Education should be
free for girls. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED: Better Quality of social/
family life. Girls would contribute equally
to the prosperity of the nation. |
|
|
ACTION BY : Ministry OF Education for
appropriate bill State Govt. Education
Ministries. Gram Panchayats/ Local Self
Govt. Social organization |
|
OUTLAY ON EDUCATION
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
NOV. 1985
|
OUTLAY ON EDUCATION |
|
PRESENT SITUATION: - India
spends only 3% of its GNP on education - Developed
countries spend 8% - 1968
Review Committee recommended 6% |
|
|
CHANGE / ACTION DESIRED: If India has to catch-up with
the world progress, she must immediately increase allocation on education to
10% of GNP. Position to be reviewed and
monitored every 5 years. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED : High literacy-rate leading
overall progress and significant breakthrough on family-welfare front. |
|
|
ACTION BY : Ministry of Education &
Ministry of Finance. |
|
PLAN OUTLAY FOR ELEMENTARY
EDUCATION
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
NOV. 1985 |
PLAN OUTLAY FOR ELEMENTARY
EDUCATION |
|
PRESENT SITUATION: Share of plan outlay for
education has been as follows: 1st Plan 56% 2nd Plan 35% 3rd Plan 34% 4th Plan 30% 5th Plan 32% 6th Plan 36% |
|
|
CHANGE/ ACTION DESIRED : Plan Outlay on Elementary
Education should be at least restored to the 1st Plan level Plan Outlay for Elementary
Education should keep pace with realistic growth-rates in population and
enrolment |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED: Constitutional obligation will
be met. Majority of population will get
at least satisfactory & meaningful elementary education |
|
|
ACTION BY: GOI – Planning Commission - Ministry
of Education - Ministry
of Finance |
|
DIFFERENTIAL EXPENDITURE ON
EDUCATION IN STATES
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
NOV. 1985 |
DIFFERENTIAL EXPENDITURE ON
EDUCATION IN STATES |
|
PRESENT SITUATION : In 1982-83 expenditure (Per
Capita) in different states was varying drastically as would be evident
below: U.P. 40.5 LOWEST
IN INDIA M.P. 49.4 BIHAR 51.2 PUNJAB 100.0 KERALA 119.5 HIGHEST ALL
INDIA 68.2 AVERAGE ---------------------------------- |
|
|
CHANGE/ACTION DESIRED: 1. No states should
be allowed to spend less than the present National Average of per Capita
Educational Outlay. 2. Educational
opportunities should be equally and evenly spread and grown in all the
states. 3. Backward states
should pump far greater resources on education for upliftment of masses. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED: Equitable distribution of
resources on education Equal opportunities in all
states Regional imbalance eliminated
which will also check migratory tendencies |
|
|
ACTION BY: GOI – Ministry of Education. State Governments – Ministry of
Education/ Finance. |
|
EXPENDITURE ON RURAL EDUCATION
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
NOV. 1985 |
EXPENDITURE ON RURAL EDUCATION |
|
PRESENT SITUATION: EXPENDITURE
ON 1950-51 1970-71 - RURAL
38.3 494.6
CRORES - URBAN
71.6
623.7 CRORES ----------
------------ TOTAL 109.9
1,118.3 CRORES ------------
----------- % EXP. ON RURAL/
TOTAL 35% 44% % RURAL POPULATION/TOTAL
75% 80% For 80% of the rural population
we spend only 44% of the total education outlay |
|
|
CHANGE/ ACTION DESIRED: Maintaining the present share
of Urban Education the weighted average for Rural Education outlay should be
increase to the Urban level i.e. 176% of the present i.e. Rs. 1978.4 crores. This will bring around the
parity in educational expenditure in proportion of population. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED : Population flow to urban
centers would be arrested Equitable and just distribution of educational
resources Upliftment of 80% population would eradicate poverty Family Welfare
will get a boost because of rural literacy. |
|
|
ACTION BY : GOI – Dept. of Education |
|
EXPENDITURE PER PUPIL/ ANNUM
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
NOV. 1985 |
EXPENDITURE PER PUPIL/ ANNUM |
|
PRESENT SITUATION :
(At 1970-71 Constant Prices) (Rupees) 1950-51 1975-76 %Growth–Rate Elementary
Education 42 55 1.1 College
Education 469
331 (-1.4) Professional
Education1640 890
(-2.5) |
|
|
CHANGE / ACTION DESIRED : - For
elementary education the growth-rate is very low - This
requires to be raised substantially - For
college education the gap must be bridged by raising fees (which have not
been revised with inflation rate ) - For
professional education privatisation should be allowed with fees levels fixed
realistically. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED : - Motivation
to poor’s to get elementary education - Realistic
fees levels for higher education will attract only those who are serious in
pursuing studies. |
|
|
ACTION BY : Ministry of Education, GOI UGC State Govts. (Education
Ministry ) |
|
STIPEND FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
NOV. 1985 |
STIPEND FOR HIGHER EDUCATION |
|
PRESENT SITUATION : All M.E. /M. Tech. Students
Receive A stipend of Rs. 1000/- per month. Likewise all students admitted to
Ph.D receive large stipends. |
|
|
CHANGE/ ACTION DESIRED : Discontinue stipends for all
such courses. Fees charged must bear relation
to the actual cost. Private Sector/Public Sector
should normally sponsor students for such advance programmes for which
tax-benefit should be extended under Income-Tax Act. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED : Only those who are serious
would pursue higher studies Technical Talents/ Knowledge will be channelised
in the useful direction |
|
|
ACTION BY: UGC GOI- Ministry of Finance Industrial Associations Chember of Commerce |
|
PRIVATE DONATIONS FOR
EDUCATION
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
NOV. 1985 |
PRIVATE DONATIONS FOR EDUCATION |
|
PRESENT SITUATION : Private donations toward
education as a percentage of total expenses were as follows: 1900 –
1901 25.0% 1950 –
1951 11.6% 1980 –
1981 3.0% |
|
|
CHANGE/ ACTION DESIRED : Private donations should be
encouraged so a percentage of total expenses were as follows : 1900 –
1901 25.0% 1950 –
1951 11.6% 1980 –
1981 3.0% Donations toward educational
purpose must quality for deduction at the rate of 150% under Income Tax
rules, both for Capita as well as revenue expenses. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED : Mobilisation of funds for
education. |
|
|
ACTION BY : GOI – Ministry of Finance |
|
ATTRACTING “BLACK- MONEY” FOR
EDUCATION
FROM THE REPORT
" CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION
"
|
NOV. 1985 |
ATTRACTING “BLACK- MONEY” FOR
EDUCATION |
|
PRESENT SITUATION : Present outlay on education is
Rs. 3200 Crores. With 1% per annum growth-rate (in population & enrolment
) the expected outlay by 1990-91 is expected outlay by 1990-91 is expected to
be double i.e. Rs. 6,400 Crores. But with the desired growth in education
this figure is bound to be around Rs. 30,000 Crores. Black-money in India is
estimated varying between Rs. 37,000 to Rs. 72,000 Crores. |
|
|
CHANGE/ ACTION DESIRED : To mobilize the need of about
Rs. 30,000 Crores for education we must exert pressure to channelize the cast
reservoir of Black-money. This can be accomplished by
allowing people/ trust to invest in Educational Institutions. For such
investments/ donations no questions should be asked with regard to source of
income. Further, such investments must be allowed a return of 5% for 10 tears
(exempted from tax) and thereof after 10 % return with maximum tax- liability
pegged at 50% of the profits made. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED : - The
resources gap with be bridged - The
“black-money” will get invested in constructive, nation- building,
human-resource development oriented activity – a very noble purpose. |
|
|
ACTION BY : GOI – Ministry of Finance & Ministry
of Education |
|
PUPIL TEACHER RATIO
|
NOV. 1985 |
PUPIL TEACHER RATIO |
|
PRESENT SITUATION : Total Teacher
Population 32.0
lacs Total Number of
Institutions 6.9 lacs Total
enrolment 11.4
crores Teacher/ Institution
ratio 4.63 Pupil/ Teacher ration 165 |
|
|
CHANGE/ ACTION
DESIRED : - Pupil/
Teacher ratio should be ideally 30 This will entail increase in Number of
teachers to 176 lacs assuming total enrolment to remain constant. - A
large number of Persons will have to be motivated to take up this profession
thru upward revision in the pay-scales and perquisites of the teaching
community. - A
large number of modern & well- equipped Teachers- training Institutes
will be required to be set up. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED : Individual attention resulting
in better quality of education. |
|
|
ACTION BY : Ministry of Human Resources
Development. |
|
TRAINED TEACHERS
|
NOV. 1985 |
TRAINED TEACHERS |
|
PRESENT SITUATION : 1950 1978 1983 Growth-Rate % Trained
Teachers 56.1 - 88.4 1.3% % Trained
teachers 1.0 17.2 - 10.7% With 1st Degree % Teachers
Non- 34.4 22.7 - (-1.5%) Matriculate |
|
|
CHANGE / ACTION DESIRED : - Non-
matriculate teachers to be replaced with Graduate-Degree-holders. - Existing
teachers must be made to pursue further study by providing appropriate
incentives. Introduce dis-incentives for those who are reluctant to up-grade
themselves. |
|
|
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED: - Improved
Quality of Education - Would
impart respectability to teaching profession. |
|
|
ACTION BY : UGC to devise special courses
for enhancing the qualifications for teachers. |
|
Teachers’ Salaries to Total
Expenses (Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
Teachers' salaries and expenses
on salary administration account for 85% to 98% of the total expenses
on education. This leaves very little for other facilities such as: • Laboratories • Libraries • Playground • Drinking water • Other infrastructure/software |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Salaries must not exceed 75%
of the total outlay. • Improve efficiency in salary
administration to achieve ~5% savings. • Allocate remaining 20%
towards: – Audio-visual aids – Instructional materials – Libraries – Hygienic
facilities |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Create conditions conducive
to learning • Make learning simple and
interesting • Improve comprehension of
pupils at a faster rate |
|
Action By |
• Government of India –
Ministry of Finance • Ministry of Education • School Principals |
Teachers’ Motivation (Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
Teachers are not sufficiently
motivated to improve the quality of education and take an active interest in
the educational process because: • Even physical needs are not
fully met (housing, salaries, education for their children, etc.) • Esteem needs are not met due
to low social status • Lack of environment for
achieving self-actualization |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Meet basic physical needs
(housing, proper salaries, education facilities for teachers and their
children) • Make teachers accountable • Improve work ethos • Employ qualified teachers
with integrity and devotion • Promotions based on
performance, not seniority • Create environment for
research and development of instructional material |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Teachers will be motivated to
work harder • Increased involvement in
developing instructional material • Greater respect from society |
|
Action By |
• Ministry of Education • UGC • State Boards of Education |
Quality of Teachers (Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
Good teachers are not attracted
due to: • Poor work ethos • Low salaries • Politicalisation of teacher
community • Low social status • Bureaucratic administration
in educational institutions • Fear of disconnect from
real-life situations • Promotions based on seniority
rather than merit |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Offer attractive salaries • Make competitiveness the sole
criterion for promotions • Regular development programs • Audit acquisition of
knowledge and skills • Encourage consultancy,
industry interaction, and exposure • Ban trade unionism in
academic careers • Rotate administrative roles |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Committed teachers • Higher job satisfaction • Practical approach to
teaching • Depoliticization |
|
Action By |
• Government of India –
Ministry of Education / Ministry of Law • AIEI and similar associations • Chambers of Commerce |
Technical (Engineering)
Institutions (Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
• Obsolete machinery/equipment • Need to re-orient curriculum • Lack of appropriate
instructional materials/textbooks • No industry–institute
interaction |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Update machinery/equipment • Continuously revise
curriculum • Encourage teachers to prepare
audio-visuals and textbooks • Promote industry–institute
interaction through consultancy assignments • Encourage students to
undertake real-life projects as dissertations |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Technical education aligned
with real-life situations and latest technology • Teachers will feel inspired
and motivated |
|
Action By |
• UGC / Departments of
Technical Education • AIEI and other associations • Chambers of Commerce |
Vocational Education (Industrial)
(Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
Institution Data: |
|
----------- |
|
|
Total Institutes |
|
|
Institutes in Tamil Nadu |
|
|
Institutes in Maharashtra |
|
|
Total No. of Designated Trades |
|
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Ensure more equitable
distribution of vocational institutes • Encourage industrial houses
to establish vocational institutes • Reorganise trade
classifications in line with industry needs |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Equitable growth and
opportunities • Availability of appropriately
skilled manpower |
|
Action By |
• Departments of Technical
Training (State Governments) |
Adult Literacy (Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
Adult Literacy Rates:1971 |
|
------ |
|
|
Rural |
|
|
Urban |
|
|
Total |
|
|
------ |
|
|
Rural |
|
|
Urban |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Use existing educational
institutions in evenings for adult education • Involve social organisations,
gram panchayats, zilla parishads, and municipalities |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Improved quality of life • Reduction in exploitation of
illiterates |
|
Action By |
• Gram Panchayats • Zilla Parishads • Social Organisations • Municipalities |
Better Utilisation of Existing
Resources (Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
• In cosmopolitan cities,
schools run in two or sometimes three shifts • In most other places, schools
operate only single shift • Many schools/colleges observe
1½ days weekly off |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• All schools to operate on two-shift
basis to double asset utilisation • Use school facilities for adult
education in late evenings • Educational institutions to
function for minimum 305 days/year • Teachers and students to put
in minimum 8 working hours/day |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Conservation of resources • Lower capital outlay • Higher return on investment • Increased enrolments |
|
Action By |
• Directorates of Education • Managements of Educational
Institutions |
Basic Facilities in Educational
Institutes (Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
• Only 60.3% schools
have blackboards (lowest: Assam – 21.5%) • Only 29.5% schools
have libraries (lowest: West Bengal – 6%) • Only 46.6% schools
have playgrounds (lowest: Bihar – 16%) • Only 91% schools have
buildings (lowest: Punjab – 63.8%) |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• All above facilities to be
raised to 100% level (minimum standard) • Centre & State
Governments to strengthen implementation and execution agencies |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Better facilities will
motivate both students and teachers |
|
Action By |
• Government of India • State Governments –
Department of Education |
Why Have Things Gone Wrong (Nov.
1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
• Planning initiative left with
State Governments • Lack of resources • Progressive centralization /
bureaucratization • Non-enforcement of discipline
and performance norms • Inadequate examination system |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Planning initiative to be
handled by agencies like NCERT, NIEPA & UGC • Ensure sufficient funding • Decentralize education at
appropriate levels • Enact legislation to prevent
participation of students and teachers in trade unionism to improve
discipline • Introduce semester/trimester
system with emphasis on regular tests and performance reviews |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Uniform standards of
education • Improved discipline leading
to better learning conditions • Continuous evaluation keeps
students engaged throughout the year |
|
Action By |
• Government of India –
Ministry of Education • Ministry of Law |
Satellite Literacy Programme
(Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
• Use of satellite
communication in education is minimal • Very few countries own
satellites • Huge potential exists for
delivering powerful instructional programs • Some educational television
centres already established |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Extensive use of satellite
communication to transform teaching-learning systems • Support both formal and
non-formal education • Encourage private
organizations to sponsor and develop programs • Attract investment (including
black money) into such programs • Provide tax exemption for
10 years on such investments |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Mass educational coverage • Uniformity and
standardization in education levels • Teacher shortages will not
hinder education delivery • Channelize black money into
nation-building activities |
|
Action By |
• Government of India –
Ministry of Education • Ministry of Broadcasting • Ministry of Finance |
Agricultural Vocational Institute
(Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
• Agricultural education is
largely available only at graduate level • Very limited vocational-level
training (except some agricultural machinery courses in few ITIs) • Rural population migrates to
cities for vocational education linked to industry |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Establish Agricultural
Vocational Institutes in rural areas offering courses such as: –
Agriculture – Horticulture – Forestry – Canning – Food preservation – Animal
husbandry – Poultry – Sericulture – Honey extraction – Bio-gas – Fish-seed
cultivation • Mobilize funding through taxation
of farm income • Use revenue exclusively for
rural institutes • Seek assistance from UNDP
& World Bank |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Reduced migration from rural
to urban areas • Boost in agricultural and
rural productivity • Upliftment of rural
population and spread of affluence • Reduction in
unemployment-related frustration |
|
Action By |
• Centres for Vocational
Studies |
Examination System (Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
• System encourages memorization
and cramming rather than understanding • Year-end exams push students
to study only at the last stage • Does not reflect true potential,
aptitude, or knowledge of students |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Introduce continuous
evaluation system with weightage for: – Regular tests – Periodic
assessments – Classwork • Shift to Credit Point
System (as in advanced countries): – Flexible pace of learning –
Promotion based on accumulation of minimum credit points |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Bright students can complete
education faster • Continuous evaluation
reflects true potential of students |
|
Action By |
• UGC • Boards of Education |
Dignity of Labour (Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
• Education system encourages
preference for white-collar jobs • Manual work is looked down
upon • Dignity of labour has
significantly declined and almost become extinct |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Restore dignity of labour • Make hands-on work
compulsory for students through: – Compulsory commission in para-military
services – Practical learning of crafts – Compulsory tree plantation – Upkeep
of civic amenities – Maintenance of educational institutions |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Restoration of dignity of
labour • Increase in working manpower • Development of discipline and
responsibility • Stronger sense of social and
national responsibility |
|
Action By |
• Government of India –
Ministry of Education • Ministry of Defence |
Industry–Institute Integration
(Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
• IITs and IIMs engaged in
consultancy work with industry • Lack of such integration in
most other institutions, especially vocational level (ITIs) |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Promote large-scale industry–institute
integration • Industry to adopt
institutions for: – Transfer of knowledge and information – Training teachers –
Sub-contracting work to institutions – Continuous interaction via project
assignments |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Improvement in quality of
technical education • Development of responsibility
and quality consciousness among students and teachers • Financial self-sufficiency of
institutions |
|
Action By |
• Department of Technical
Education • AIEI and similar associations • Chambers of Commerce • Educational (Technical)
Institutions |
Income-Tax Exemption on
Reimbursement of Educational Expenses (Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
• Till 1982–83, educational
expenses reimbursed to employees (through Welfare Trusts) were fully
exempt from income tax • This facility has been
withdrawn • As a result, many welfare
trusts have shut down |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• All payments towards
educational expenses should be exempt from income tax • This will ease burden on
parents and mobilize resources for education • The earlier benefit should be
restored immediately |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Parents will be encouraged to
invest more in children’s education • Dropout rates (especially in
middle & secondary levels) will reduce in the organized sector |
|
Action By |
• Ministry of Finance –
Government of India |
Audit Committees for Education
(Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
There is hardly any audit being
done on: • Educational processes • Quality of teachers • Institutional expenditure • Facilities • Machinery & equipment |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Conduct bi-annual audits
in a prescribed format by committees comprising: – Educationists –
Industrialists – Prominent citizens • Committees to be appointed by
affiliating universities/boards • Institutions failing audit
standards should be stopped from functioning (not just derecognized) • Enact necessary laws to
enforce this |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Policies will evolve in line
with real needs • Higher standards of education |
|
Action By |
• UGC • Government of India –
Ministry of Education • State Governments – Ministry
of Education |
Requisite Norms for Educational
Institutes (Nov. 1985)
|
SECTION |
DETAILS |
|
Present Situation |
• There are hardly any
well-defined and widely known norms for establishing new educational
institutions |
|
Change / Action Desired |
• Define broad and detailed
guidelines (model norms) for each branch of education • No institution should be
allowed to start unless: – An independent and impartial audit team
certifies compliance with norms |
|
Advantages Expected |
• Proper facilities, equipment,
and qualified teachers ensured • Delivery of relevant and
appropriate education |
|
Action By |
• UGC • NCERT • SCERT |
ANNEXURES
Graphs & Charts
EDUCATION SYSTEM – A FRAMEWORK
FLOW STRUCTURE (BOTTOM → TOP)
FOUNDATION LEVEL
|
Level |
Description |
|
Nursery |
Entry level |
|
K.G. |
Kindergarten |
|
Elementary |
Primary education |
|
Middle |
Middle school |
SECONDARY LEVEL
|
Level |
Description |
|
Higher Secondary / High School |
Core branching stage |
POST-SECONDARY PATHWAYS (10+2
ENTRY)
1. General Academic Stream
|
Path |
Duration |
|
Jr. College |
10+2 |
|
BA / B.Sc. / B.Com. |
12+3 / 12+4 |
|
Post Graduation |
After degree |
2. Professional Streams
|
Field |
Duration |
|
Medical |
12 + 4 |
|
Engineering Degree |
12 + 4 |
3. Technical / Diploma Stream
|
Path |
Duration |
|
Engineering Diploma |
10 + 3 |
|
→ Can lead to Engineering
Degree (lateral progression) |
4. Vocational Streams
(A) Agricultural Vocational
(10+2)
Courses include:
- Agriculture
- Horticulture
- Canning
- Animal Husbandry
- Forestry
- Food Preservation
- Agricultural Mechanics
(B) Industrial Vocational (ITI
Level – 10+2)
5. Other Streams
|
Path |
Duration |
|
Others |
12 + 3 |
PROFESSIONAL / SPECIALIZED
LEVEL
|
Path |
Description |
|
AICWA / ACA |
Professional certifications |
|
Post Graduation |
Advanced specialization |
EDUCATION ECOSYSTEM MODEL
CORE FRAMEWORK
Central Node: EDUCATION
Surrounded by six key
stakeholders:
|
Stakeholder |
Role in Education System |
|
Teachers |
Knowledge delivery, mentoring,
quality control |
|
Students |
Primary beneficiaries and
participants |
|
Parents |
Support system and value
reinforcement |
|
Community |
Social environment and cultural
influence |
|
Politicians |
Policy direction and governance
priorities |
|
Government Administration |
Implementation, regulation,
funding |
EDUCATION AT A GLANCE (DATA
SUMMARY)
1. Number of Educational
Institutions (in lakhs)
|
Year |
Total |
Primary Schools |
|
1950 |
2.3 |
2.01 |
|
1985 |
6.9 |
5.04 |
2. Total Student Population
(in crores)
|
Year |
Population |
|
1950 |
2.8 |
|
1982–83 |
11.4 |
3. Number of Teachers (in
lakhs)
|
Year |
Teachers |
|
1950 |
7.5 |
|
1983 |
32.0 |
4. Education Expenditure (₹ in
crores)
|
Year |
Expenditure |
|
1950 |
114.3 |
|
1976–77 |
2304.0 |
|
1982–83 |
5185.9 |
ENROLMENT RATES (1950/51 TO
1980/81)
|
Description |
Value |
|
Growth Rate for Primary
Education |
4.55% |
|
Growth Rate for Higher
Secondary |
7.08% |
|
Ratio Girls to Boys in
1950/1951 |
0.16 : 1 |
|
Ratio Girls to Boys in
1980/1981 |
0.42 : 1 |
|
Growth Rate (Relative) for
Girls |
3.30% |
|
Growth Rate for Higher
Education |
9.78% |
Source: Challenge of
Educations
ENROLMENT GAP (Age Group: 6–14
Years)
(Figures in Crores)
|
Category |
1981 |
Projected 1990–91 (Assuming
Growth @ 4.5%) |
|
Elementary Education |
9.30 |
11.20 |
|
Secondary Education |
0.95 |
1.15 |
|
Higher Education |
0.31 |
0.38 |
|
Total Enrolment |
10.56 |
12.73 |
|
Total Population (Age 6–14) |
15.00 |
17.40 |
|
Gap |
4.44 |
4.67 |
Source: Challenge of Edu
EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
|
Category |
1950 |
1985 |
Growth Rate over 1950 (%) |
|
No. of Educational Institutions |
2,30,000 |
6,90,000 |
2.8 |
|
No. of Primary Schools |
2,01,000 |
5,04,000 |
2.65 |
|
No. of Middle Schools |
13,400 |
1,23,300 |
7.2 |
|
No. of Secondary Schools |
7,300 |
52,279 |
6.3 |
|
No. of Other Institutions |
8,300 |
10,421 |
0.65 |
Ratios
|
Ratio Type |
1950 |
1985 |
|
Middle : Primary |
1 : 15 |
1 : 4 |
|
Secondary : Middle |
1 : 1.84 |
1 : 2.5 |
EXPENDITURE ON EDUCATION
|
Year / Category |
1950/51 |
1976/77 |
1982/83 (B) |
Compound Growth in 35 Years |
|
Total Expenditure (₹ Crores) |
114.3 |
2304.4 |
5185.9 |
12.66% |
|
Expenditure on Primary |
63% |
27% |
— |
— |
|
Expenditure on Middle |
9.9% |
20.7% |
— |
— |
|
Expenditure on Secondary |
29.7% |
31.7% |
— |
— |
Source: Challenge of
Education
BUDGETARY REQUIREMENT
|
Description |
Amount (₹ Crores) |
|
Actual Expenditure on Education
(1980–81) |
1537 Cr. |
|
Requirement at Constant Prices
(1980–81) in 1990–91 |
3200 Cr. |
|
Requirement in 1990–91
Considering 8% Inflation |
6400 Cr. |
Source: Challenge of
Education
SHARE OF PLAN OUTLAY FOR
EDUCATION
|
Plan |
Elementary Education |
University Education |
|
1st Plan |
56% |
9% |
|
2nd Plan |
35% |
— |
|
3rd Plan |
34% |
— |
|
4th Plan |
30% |
— |
|
5th Plan |
32% |
— |
|
6th Plan |
36% |
16% |
PRIVATE DONATIONS
|
Year |
Private Donations to Total
Expenses on Education |
|
1900–1901 |
25% |
|
1950–1951 |
11.6% |
|
1980–1981 |
3% |
Source: Challenge of
Education
PER CAPITA EXPENSES ON EDUCATION
(1982–1983)
|
State |
Rs. (in Crores) |
Remarks |
|
U.P. |
40.5 |
Lowest |
|
M.P. |
49.4 |
— |
|
Bihar |
51.2 |
— |
|
Punjab |
100 |
— |
|
Kerala |
119.5 |
Highest |
|
All India Average |
68.2 |
— |
EDUCATIONAL EXPENSES (RURAL vs
URBAN)
|
Category |
1950–51 (₹ Crores) |
1970–71 (₹ Crores) |
|
Rural Areas (a) |
38.3 |
494.6 |
|
Urban Areas (b) |
71.6 |
623.7 |
|
Total (a + b) |
109.9 |
1118.3 |
Ratios
|
Ratio Type |
1950–51 |
1970–71 |
|
Rural / Urban (a / b) |
0.53 |
0.79 |
|
Rural / Total (a / a+b) |
0.35 |
0.44 |
Population Context
|
Metric |
1950–51 |
1970–71 |
|
Rural Population / Total |
75% |
80% |
EXPENDITURE PER PUPIL PER
ANNUM
(At 1970–1971 Constant Prices)
|
Stage |
1950–51 (₹) |
1975–76 (₹) |
Annual Growth / Decline
Rate |
|
Elementary Education |
41.9 |
55.2 |
+1.1% |
|
College Education |
468.9 |
330.9 |
−1.4% |
|
Professional Education |
1640.4 |
890.1 |
−2.5% |
Source: Challenge of
Education, Page 86
TEACHERS’ PROFILE
A. Overall Teacher Strength
& Growth
|
Category |
1950 |
1983 |
Compound Growth Rate |
|
Total Teachers |
7.5 Lakhs |
32.0 Lakhs |
4.6% |
Growth by Level
|
Level |
Growth Rate |
|
Primary |
3.0% |
|
Middle |
7.5% |
|
Secondary |
10.6% |
B. Teacher Qualification
Trends
|
Metric |
1950 |
1983 |
Growth Rate |
|
% Trained Teachers |
56.1% |
88.4% |
1.26% |
C. Qualification Improvement
(1950–1978)
|
Metric |
1950 |
1978 |
Compound Growth (%) |
|
% Trained Teachers with 1st
Degree |
1% |
17.2% |
10.70% |
|
% Teachers Less Than Matric |
34.4% |
22.7% |
−1.5% |
Source: Challenge of
Education
QUESTIONNAIRE
To be completed by
Non-Government Engineering Colleges / Polytechnics started with the approval of
Government of Maharashtra on no grant-in-aid basis
MNP/apa
O&M - L&T